step 3. Show

Desk 1 portrays the fresh prevalence of each of your own risks of the research, according to the degree of severity discovered. While doing so, they reveals this new contrasting amongst the distributions of children to your other threats. Overall, the players which displayed nothing wrong ranged anywhere between % who had no troubles with challenging Web sites have fun with or over to 83.4% that has no troubles with on the web brushing. We note that the range of reasonable and you can significant troubles ranged between 4% to own sexting and you may 17% having challenging Internet sites have fun with. 9% from average/severe troubles along with cyberbullying, it attained thirteen.7%. The latest frequencies found in the more levels of issues was indeed always greater for girls compared to males.

Desk 1

Incidence of any of the threats due to the fact a function of the new severity of your own condition to the total attempt and of gender.

In this regard, significant differences were also found between boys and girls in the mean total scores of cyberbullying victimization (Welch’s t = ?2.02, p < 0.043, d = 0.07), online grooming (Welch's t = ?3.51, p < 0.001, d = 0.12) and problematic Internet use (Welch's t = ?2.07, p < 0.039, d = 0.07). In these cases, the mean scores were higher for girls than for boys. There were no significant differences in the rest of the risks: cyber dating abuse victimization (Welch's t = ?1.9, p < 0.058, d = 0.12) and sexting (Welch's t = 0.94, p < 0.410, d = 0.03).

Regarding the type of school (private and public), significant differences were only found in the risks of online grooming (t = ?3.37, p < 0.001, d = 0.13) and sexting (t = 3.8, p < 0.001, d = 0.15). The mean scores were higher in public schools than in private schools in both cases.

In terms of the educational stage (1st–2nd grade of CSE, 3rd–4th grade of CSE and Post-secondary Education), statistically significant differences were found for the risks of cyberbullying victimization (p < 0.002), online grooming (p < 0.001), sexting (p < 0.001) and problematic Internet use (p < 0.001). The scores were higher in 3rd–4th grades, except for online grooming victimization, where higher scores were found in Post-secondary Education (see Dining table dos ).

Table 2

Differences while the a purpose of educational stage (1st–second, 3rd–next levels away from CSE and you may Article-second Knowledge) on risks (letter = 3212, with the exception of possible of cyber dating abuse interracial cupid indir having letter = 1061).

Note: Yards = arithmetic indicate; SD = standard departure, F = Welch’s-F, p = significance; ? 2 = eta squared.

Table step 3 reveals the latest correlations between your some risks. Them got self-confident and you can tall correlations along, to your dating between cyberbullying victimization and you will cyber dating victimization position out. Internet sites risks that have an intimate parts (on the internet brushing and you will sexting) have been highly synchronised. Generally, brand new correlations was in fact highest for boys for the majority of one’s risks, with the exception of the fresh matchmaking between cyber relationship victimization and grooming and you can between problematic Websites fool around with and you will cyberbullying victimization, on the internet grooming and you will sexting.

Table step 3

Note: The correlations for boys are shown below the diagonal and for girls above it. All correlations are significant at p < 0.001. M = arithmetic mean; SD = standard deviation.

Desk 4 presents the brand new comorbidities one of many certain Web sites risks relevant so you can individual telecommunications (cyberbullying victimization, cyber relationships abuse victimization, sexting an internet-based brushing). Just the professionals which finished all the items about the threats associated in order to victimization (letter = 1109) was indeed noticed (i.e., eliminating from the investigation people that had no mate). Of one’s kept members, 60.7% showed one of your analysed threats (letter = 674). The risk to your highest private frequency is actually cyberbullying victimization (%), followed by on the internet grooming. The most prevalent a couple of-risk combos was cyberbullying victimization-online brushing and you may cyberbullying-sexting. We highlight the 3-risk combination of cyberbullying-sexting-brushing victimization. Ultimately, 5.49% of one’s victimized teenagers exhibited all risks conjointly.